I haven’t watched The Office on purpose in a while, although I see an episode now and then. Once upon a time I was a big fan, but I bailed before Steve Carrell did because something was wrong. For whatever reason, I just didn’t enjoy the show anymore. Other shows popped up (Community, Modern Family), and I moved on.

Then last week I heard Stephen Merchant talking about the original version of The Office, which he helped make with Ricky Gervais. In talking about their approach to making the show, Merchant said he and Gervais were really after reality. They wanted viewers to see themselves, their coworkers, and other people they know on the screen. If you watched the show, you probably experienced recognition every episode.

In talking about Gervais’s approach to his character, David Brent, Merchant said Gervais was intensely concerned about about the truth. When they were hashing out specific scenes, Gervais was always dedicated to whether or not his character actually do or say something that was in the script. That was the filter the show.

Without being condescending, I’d say the current version of The Office is after absurdity rather than reality. I don’t envision the show’s producers, writers, and actors making impassioned arguments for what the characters would and wouldn’t do.

There’s nothing wrong with absurdity per se, but I think what you end up with is less like the original version of The Office and more like The Simpsons—a funhouse mirror instead of just a mirror.

Now that I think about it, once upon a time I was a big fan of The Simpsons too. But these days I’m more interested in the truth.

As many as 14 tornadoes descended upon the Dallas/Fort Worth metroplex last Tuesday afternoon and evening. If you’ve never heard the tension in your local weatherman’s voice as the tornado sirens begin to wail and the sky turns a sickly green, it’s a terrifying  experience.

We’ve largely subdued and modernized and Apple-fied our lives, so the prospect of something we can’t predict or control (let alone prevent) — a cold, erratic, murderous lynch mob of wind and debris — is the rarest of birds. The tornado gathers its strength and rage, then skips from neighborhood to neighborhood ripping our material goods from their tenuous moorings. The tornado slings roofs and trailers and people and animals as it cuts a winding path across a community. Like I said, terrifying.

It was only three years ago that I ran upstairs to grab my infant daughter from her bed as the sound of the tree in our front yard being broken in half filled the house. We rode out the storm in our laundry room — again, terrifying. It was bizarre, an hour later, to walk down our street and see trees and shingles in driveways and on sidewalks.

The trees and shingles just weren’t supposed to be there, you know? They were supposed to be up, not down. But that’s what a tornado does — it violently disrupts the places and order of things. It’s, like, terrifying.

So, I’ve been thinking about tornadoes this week.

 

Last Tuesday’s storms in Dallas didn’t claim any lives, thank God. But last month 38 people were killed when places like Henryville, Indiana, were hit by monstrous tornadoes. The devastation was shocking, even for a veteran of North Texas storms.

Following the suffering in Henryville, John Piper, in a blog post for DesiringGod.org, asked:

Why would God reach down his hand and drag his fierce fingers across rural America killing at least 38 people with 90 tornadoes in 12 states, and leaving some small towns with scarcely a building standing, including churches?”

I couldn’t help but wonder if that’s what happened because I’d never thought of tornadoes as God’s fierce fingers before. I don’t know about you, but whenever I’ve prayed in the midst of an awful storm, I’ve asked God to protect me with His hand, not from His hand.

I don’t know what John Piper prays when confronted with what we generally consider a natural disaster, but he’s clear about the source: “If a tornado twists at 175 miles an hour and stays on the ground like a massive lawnmower for 50 miles, God gave the command,” Piper wrote.

Although it has been several weeks since I read Piper’s post, I can’t leave it alone (or it won’t leave me alone). In the wake of last week’s weather in Dallas, I’ve been considering whether those malevolent funnels were God’s fierce fingers or not.

I suppose there’s a lot of theological work to be done, navigating hermeneutics and dual wills and cross-references and the Ancient Near East context. Piper has gone through his process, and you can get a glimpse of it in his post.

My process, by comparison, is admittedly lacking.

I’m no preacher; I’m no scholar. I’m a flimsy thinker and a blogger-no-call-me-a-digital-philosopher-instead! I’m a kid who finds himself out of his depth in Big Boy Conversations.

And yet, the next time the weatherman gestures at a red blob on the radar and uses the phrase “hook echo,” I imagine I’ll be asking Jesus to rebuke the storm (Matthew 8:26) not his Father’s fierce fingers.

I mean no disrespect to John Piper, and I hope that’s evident from this post, but we’re opposite sides of this conversation. Why would God reach down his hand and drag his fierce fingers across rural America? I don’t think He did.

Echo 2012

March 27, 2012 — Leave a comment

In case you missed it, the Echo 2012 site is live.

The site is beautiful (okay, I’m biased) and the event itself is going to be even better (okay, I’m still biased). The lineup is chock full of people who I respect and admire, and I can’t wait to hear what they have to share. If you can make it to Echo this summer, come on out.

And if I can’t persuade you, maybe our promo video can. Brace yourself:

(Did you spot me in the background at the church? I’m really good at being tall and walking in a straight line.)

Advice from Kerouac

March 27, 2012 — Leave a comment

I love this list by Jack Kerouac: Belief and Technique for Modern Prose. His shorthand is odd at times, and a few of the items don’t make any sense to me, but one of them stuck out:

Be in love with yr life

There’s that shorthand I was talking about. And even though it seems as though Kerouac was ahead of the txting curve by a few decades, don’t let it distract you. That phrase, Be in love with yr life, is pretty weighty, right? I mean, if you’re going to commit yourself to that idea, you’re committing yourself to making some changes — how you spend your energy, time, money, and emotions.

Interesting. I’m still chewing on it, but I went ahead and whipped up a hacky little graphic to help me remember:

At the risk of becoming predominantly  a Sharer of Quotes and Passages, I came across an intriguing thought today and I felt compelled to share it. Here’s a little something from Frederick Buechner’s Telling the Truth: The Gospel as Tragedy, Comedy & Fairy Tale:

The preacher has to be willing to speak as tragic a word as Jesus speaks, which is the word that even if all the problems that can be solved are solved—poverty, war, ignorance, injustice, disease—and even if all the answers the world can give are proved each in its own way workable, even so man labors and is heavy laden in his helplessness; poor naked wretch that bides the pelting of the storm that is no less pitiless for all the preaching of all the preachers.

That, friends, is a sentence.

Two and a half years ago I read this Malcolm Gladwell piece on football and brain trauma, and it messed me up. I don’t know what it is about my personality or upbringing that is so prone to guilt, but I feel guilty about watching football these days. It’s true. My favorite sport is one that appears to systematically, but incrementally, destroy many of its participants. At times I think I enjoy reading about football (strategy, analysis, personnel decisions, etc.) more than I enjoy actually watching football. When I’m reading on an LCD screen, I’m only one whose head hurts afterward.

That’s an awfully long setup to get to a recommendation of another piece, this one by Charles P. Pierce: “The Saints, Head-hunting, and (Another) Disaster for the NFL.” Pierce is wickedly sharp, and I simply loved this line:

“Science, that great murderer of comfortable illusions, continues to increasingly undermine the bargain we’d cut for ourselves with the game.”

Maybe I’m the only one who attaches any guilt to enjoying football, but maybe not. Either way, after having recently broken up with the Dallas Cowboys in an emotional private ceremony, I find myself wondering what it’d be like for me as a fan to avoid the 2012 season altogether. I’m not quite ready to pull the trigger on that act of self-righteous abstention just yet. But I’m mulling it over, if for no other reason than the fact that science continues to undermine the bargain I’d cut for myself with the game.

Saul Bass was, like, a genius and stuff. So there’s one difference between him and me right there. But check out  Bass’s approach to his work (via Frank Chimero):

“I want to make beautiful things, even if nobody cares.”

Well said, Mr. Bass. I certainly aspire to that dedication to beauty, art, and craftsmanship. But I’m not there yet.

If I’m honest, my approach would likely twist those words around something fierce:

“I want beautiful people to care, even if I don’t make anything.”

And there’s another difference between me and Bass. Oops. Time to work on that.

My New Social Media Policy

February 21, 2012 — 1 Comment

I just came across NBA player Stephen Jackson’s new social media policy (source), and I think I might make it my new policy as well.

Check it out:

“If u not a real fan of mine or if u dont make 9mil per yr. or have more than 500 followers. Dont tweet me.”

It’s simple, confrontational, and elitist … just like me. What could go wrong?

I’ve Been Reading

February 6, 2012 — 2 Comments

I’ve picked up my reading pace over the last several months, so I thought I’d list out the books I’ve read in that span. I’m not one for proper, thorough, nuanced book reviews, but I’m happy to offer my two cents here and there. I’m always including affiliate links for these titles because I love you and you love me. Cool? Let’s get into it:

A Million Miles in a Thousand Years by Donald Miller — I just finished re-reading this one, and it’s still great. It’s so personal and, at times, gut-wrenching. And now that Blue Like Jazz: the Movie is a reality, it’s great to revisit the stories about the screenplay coming together.

Anything You Want by Derek Sivers — This is a quick but fascinating book from Seth Godin’s Domino Project. Sivers offers leaders and aspiring entrepreneurs advice in the form of his experiences founding, running, and selling CDBaby. It’s accessible and pretty handy, too.

The Book of Basketball: The NBA According to The Sports Guy by Bill Simmons — This book is way too long and contains way too much information about the history of the game of basketball. But I read every word and enjoyed most of it. Simmons is great, and it’s fun to read about the legends of the game.

Born Standing Up: A Comic’s Life by Steve Martin — Steve Martin was done with stand-up comedy by the time I was born, so I always think of him as an actor. That and the fact that Martin is a skilled writer made for an entertaining read. As someone who feels as though I’m still honing in on the whole career thing, it was motivating to learn about all the work Martin put in over the years honing his craft.

Downtown Owl by Chuck Klosterman — I love Chuck Klosterman, but I didn’t like this novel. Truth be told, I bailed halfway through for two reasons: I didn’t care about any of the characters and I didn’t care what happened next. Sorry, Chuck, but I would like to read The Visible Man someday.

The Furious Longing of God by Brennan Manning — I love the combination of the rawness of Manning’s past and the beauty of his prose. As a reader with my share of identity and esteem issues, the message of this book was so timely and meaningful for me. Of course, that means the message was also plenty challenging for me, and that’s a good thing.

The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo by Stieg Larsson — I felt compelled to read this book before the movie came out, though I’m not sure why. The narrative is tough to stomach in places, but the pacing is good and the mystery hooked me. I imagine I’ll finish this trilogy at some point, but I’m not chomping at the bit like I was with …

The Hunger Games Trilogy by Suzanne Collins — Yes, this counts as three books, but I felt it might be patronizing to list them individually. It’s also patronizing to classify these as Young Adult, right? These books were incredible and I consumed them at an alarming rate. Just read ‘em already.

Jesus, My Father, the CIA, and Me: A Memoir of Sorts by Ian Cron — I enjoyed Ian Cron’s Chasing Francis but I loved this book. I resonated with Cron’s story of growing up and trying to make sense of God and family and how to deal with it all. Cron’s book illustrates the power of digging into our stories (rather than running from them) and trying to make peace with them.

Pulphead: Essays by John Jeremiah Sullivan — Okay, I’m almost done with this one, but I’m taking it essay by essay. The first essay, about Sullivan’s trip to a Christian music festival and his adolescent journey into (and out of) Christianity, roped me in. From there, I enjoyed his observations and storytelling on everything from Native American caves to the time his brother almost died by electrocution.

UNTITLED: Thoughts on the Creative Process by Blaine Hogan — Blaine is the Creative Director at Willow Creek Community Church, someone who makes good things, and an all-around nice guy. His first book is accessible and inspiring, so grab it if the creative process is part of your life in some way. (That means you.)

____________

UP NEXT:

The King Jesus Gospel: The Original Good News Revisited by Scot McKnight — In the time I’ve spent working on this post I’ve almost made it to the halfway point in this one. Dang, it’s good. McKnight has opened my eyes to both the gospel as the Bible articulates it and our modern-day Plan of Salvation culture. And no, they’re not the same thing.

What have you been reading? Any recommendations?

On Jeans

February 1, 2012 — 1 Comment

Is this what we’re doing with jeans now? Is this the cool thing? Apparently so.

If I’m honest, my concern is that by the time I’m ready to do this with my jeans (and yes, it’s going to take some time) it won’t be the cool thing anymore.

As an aside, because I remember this exact style from the fourth grade at Woodway Elementary (20 years ago?), I’m somewhat wary of it. You know, like it’s a trick or something.

Let’s say I’m ready to get my roll on in late 2012 or early 2013, but let’s say the sartorialists have moved on by then. Do I stick with it so I’m ahead of the game when it comes back around in 2030?

This is a big deal, and not trivial in the least, so to be continued